Which sounds better as a book title? The Hunter Oath Or The Hunter's Oath

[Guest]

I'm in the process of finalizing a title for my upcoming book and find myself deliberating between two very similar yet distinct options: 'The Hunter Oath' and 'The Hunter's Oath'. While both titles evoke a certain imagery and tone, nuances in phrasing can influence reader perception and the book's overall appeal.

For avid readers, writers, or those with a keen sense for literary aesthetics: Which of these titles resonates more with you or feels more compelling? I'm interested in understanding the subtle emotional or interpretive differences each might elicit, helping me make a more informed choice for my book's title.

[Jeff]

The second one flows better. It’s easier to say.

[Sharon]

The first makes me think the oath is taken by all hunters. It also makes me think the book is about the oath.

The second makes me think it is one specific hunter. It makes me think that the hunter might have to deal with something that conflicts with the oath, or do something because he is sworn to this oath.

If you remove “the” I would assume your MC is named Hunter. Maybe he’s getting married or promised his parents he’d be a good man?

Hope this was helpful. Any of these would make a good title, just depends on what the book is about.

Don't miss: I'm struggling to come up with a title that I like

[Rosemary]

The first is a proper noun, the name of a single oath known as The Hunters Oath. The second is using possessive case and the oath is the possession of the hunter.

If you wanted the oath to be multiple hunters oath, you would say The Hunters Oath.

[Louise]

The Hunter's oath is grammatically correct because the oath would be a possession of the hunter, regardless if there's one or two hunters involved. Plus it flows better x

[Ragheed]

Depends on what's more important, I would say.

The first one suggests that the book is about the oath. The second suggests that it is about the hunter.

[Tonya]

Sounds like you're talking about a character who IS a hunter with the hunter's oath. The first, The Hunter oath, sound like we'll be reading about someone who must decide to become a hunter. Depends on which you are aiming for.

THE HUNTER'S OATH sounds a bit more epic to me, but it's your call..

Explore these too: I am struggling for ideas for a title of a book

[Philip]

First one makes it sound like anyone who is a hunter must take this oath.

Second one sounds like a ranger who made a personal oath about something.

Whichever the story is, pick that one.

[Chloe]

Depends on what the oath is. If I read a book titled The Hunter Oath, I would expect a story where the oath was a cultural standard for all hunters.

I would expect it to be something all hunters followed, and that expectation either caused personal conflict for the protagonist or defined them in some way. If I read a book called The Hunter’s Oath, I would expect the oath to be something more personal and unique to the hunter.

An oath they made and the impact of that decision or declaration.

So I guess the title would depend on what the story is.